[e-lang] capability myths demolished!
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 21:04:46 -0500
Damn. There's always *one* little typo which I feel the need to fix by
following-up to my own post.
I, Zooko, wrote:
> that they actually meant "The fact that the `Remove' action in [our cap model]
> has no real counterpart in [our ACL model]...". This is a change which reverses
> the sense of the sentence to match the format result that they give: that their
> ACL model is weakly contained in their cap model, but not vice versa, which
> means that their cap model can do everything that their ACL model can do, but
> not vice versa.