[e-lang] Count of complex guards
markm at cs.jhu.edu
Tue Jan 4 16:15:42 EST 2005
Dean Tribble wrote:
> Mark Miller wrote:
>>> nullOK[foo] doesn't work
>> What do you mean, "doesn't work"? It doesn't work computationally? Or
>> it doesn't read well? [...]
> I'm glad you didn't see it either. The "K" is capitalized, so it
> doesn't name a guard.
Got me! Suggestions?
> I thought of proposing "optional", but that usually means that the arg
> doesn't need to be present at all, which is not what we mean here.
Good point. So "optional" is out.
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
More information about the e-lang