[e-lang] A trivial naming problem: too many Scopes?

[Kevin Reid]

On Jul 11, 2005, at 22:31, Mark Miller wrote:
> Kevin Reid wrote:
>> Can E-on-Java's Scope#getScopeLayout be considered an implementation 
>> detail?
>
> I think the answer is yes, but I haven't really examined the issue 
> yet. Do you see any problems making ScopeLayouts be a purely 
> private/internal notion?

None at all. What I wanted to know is whether there is some way in 
which they are *not* private, as I have never used them in an E 
program.

I've already committed the name change (revision 127).

-- 
Kevin Reid                            <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>