[e-lang] literal-oname?

[David Hopwood]

Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Kevin Reid wrote:
> 
>>Why has this syntax been disabled by default?
> 
[...]
> 3) I expect that no one other than you would be affected by discontinuing the 
> literal-oname syntax. From that same previous conversation, I thought you said 
> that it would be painless for you to stop using it. If I misunderstood, my 
> apologies.

As a matter of policy, I think that known-incompatible changes should be
announced on the e-lang list, even if they are not expected to cause any
problems.

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood at blueyonder.co.uk>