E-on-Java accepts ":Foo" as a pattern, equivalent to "_ :Foo". E-on- CL does not. Is this syntax archaic or current; i.e. should I add it to E-on-CL or edit the code to not use it? (FWIW, I find it slightly ugly.) Separate issue: E-on-Java is inconsistent: e`a =~ :b` is accepted, but epatt`:b` is not. -- Kevin Reid <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>