[e-lang] Why aren't guards allowed on forward declarations?
David Hopwood
david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk
Wed Sep 26 16:57:17 EDT 2007
Kevin Reid wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2007, at 16:20, David Hopwood wrote:
>> [silly, untested code]
>> ...
>> def succeeded :boolean
>
> (Syntactic note: Forward declarations may not have guards.)
Any good reason for this? It seems as though the semantics would be clear.
--
David Hopwood <david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk>
More information about the e-lang
mailing list