[e-lang] Why aren't guards allowed on forward declarations?

David Hopwood david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk
Wed Sep 26 16:57:17 EDT 2007


Kevin Reid wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2007, at 16:20, David Hopwood wrote:
>>    [silly, untested code]
>>    ...
>>    def succeeded :boolean
> 
> (Syntactic note: Forward declarations may not have guards.)

Any good reason for this? It seems as though the semantics would be clear.

-- 
David Hopwood <david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk>



More information about the e-lang mailing list