[e-lang] An attack on a mint

[Bill Frantz]

kpreid at mac.com (Kevin Reid) on Tuesday, March 4, 2008 wrote:

>There's another form of testing that might help more though:  
>Haskell's QuickCheck and its descendants. They check that an  
>arbitrary predicate is true for a randomly selected subset of all  
>possible inputs to it.
>
>Since the test cases are machine-generated, they are not limited to  
>the programmer's consideration of what needs to be tested. However,  
>they might well check many simple cases and miss the edge cases where  
>failures occur, since they ignore the structure of the algorithm  
>being tested.
>
>http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/QuickCheck/

I have used random number driven test drivers for some testing in
the past. Random number testing has turned up problems which I
would not have found (until after the code went production) by
normal techniques. I like the technique.

Cheers - Bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | gets() remains as a monument | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | to C's continuing support of | 16345 Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | buffer overruns.             | Los Gatos, CA 95032