[e-lang] A broken brand?
raould at gmail.com
Thu Mar 13 18:24:14 EDT 2008
ah, of course, makes sense.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Kevin Reid <kpreid at mac.com> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 18:04, Raoul Duke wrote:
> >> The problem here is that we have two situations that we cannot
> >> really
> >> distinguish. One of them is considered valid (holding the
> >> unsealer and a
> > is reflection generally considered fair game? e.g. the box could test
> > if there are extra stacks in the call hierarchy?
> No. The box (all objects in an ocap system, even) has no authority to
> have that information.
> Making call stack information available puts you right back to
> identity-based access control, confused deputies, and information
> Kevin Reid <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>
> e-lang mailing list
> e-lang at mail.eros-os.org
More information about the e-lang