[e-lang] VatTP and Waterken protocols compared

[Marc Stiegler]

It has worked well enough for us only for the simplest upgrade scenarios.
The jury is still out on harder scenarios. The only thing for certain is, we
will need better tools for harder upgrades. The question is, can tools good
enough be made at all?

--marcs

2008/9/20 Karp, Alan H <alan.karp at hp.com>

>  MarkM wrote:
>
>
> > The acid test of the two philosophies will be their friendliness to
> upgrade. On this, the jury is still out. (Research opportunity!)
>
>
> Tyler has written a "touch" program that reserializes after an upgrade. It
> has worked quite well for us.
>
>
>
> ________________________
>
> Alan Karp
>
> Principal Scientist
>
> Virus Safe Computing Initiative
>
> Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
>
> 1501 Page Mill Road
>
> Palo Alto, CA 94304
>
> (650) 857-3967, fax (650) 857-7029
>
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Alan_Karp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e-lang mailing list
> e-lang at mail.eros-os.org
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/e-lang
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/e-lang/attachments/20080924/ba5929dc/attachment.html