[e-lang] (fully qualified) names of basic types
kpreid at mac.com
Thu Mar 19 19:43:59 EDT 2009
On Mar 19, 2009, at 19:02, Mark Miller wrote:
> E used to use "integer" for exactly this reason. But no one liked
> that, and the switch to "int", despite the huge differences from the C
> int, seemed to please everyone at the time.
Clarification: I'm talking about the FQNs/import names, not the names
of the guards in the safe scope, which can stay the same.
> For characters, I think we
> should stick with "char" regardless.
Kevin Reid <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>
More information about the e-lang