[e-lang] (fully qualified) names of basic types

[David-Sarah Hopwood]

Kevin Reid wrote:
> We recently had a discussion on IRC about what the FQNs of the basic  
> types such as integer, float, string, etc. should be on E  
> implementations that are not Java-based, since it would be  
> inappropriate to use java.lang.*. We decided to use  
> org.erights.e.elib.atom.*.
> 
> Further question: What are the *names* of these two types:
> 
> Int or Integer?
> Char or Character?

Does that represent a Unicode character, or a code unit?

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood ⚥