[frantz@netcom.com: Re: Promptness]
Jonathan Shapiro
shap@viper.cis.upenn.edu
Mon, 5 Dec 94 20:57:14 -0500
Return-Path: <frantz@netcom.com>
From: frantz@netcom.com (William S. Frantz)
Subject: Re: Promptness
To: shap@viper.cis.upenn.edu (Jonathan Shapiro)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 17:23:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <199412051853.KAA01873@mail3.netcom.com> from "Jonathan Shapiro" at Dec 5, 94 01:54:33 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 713
> If we are talking about mission-critical hard RT systems, then
> expectations seem inadequate. The customer won't be comforted by
> expectations when the Boeing goes down. In this case, the contract is
> either formally met or it isn't.
But, sometimes the Boeing does go down. There is technically no way
to garentee that a system will work. No matter how much redundancy
you have. Add as many nines as you want to the .99999... probability
and it still isn't 1.0.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz Periwinkle -- Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA