• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] [ Next ]
• [ Previous ] Maybe in reply to: John C.Randolph Next in thread: Jens-Uwe Mager

This is the third time inversion has been mentioned here.

According to their web site, the Inversion effort has no code yet. It appears (to me) that they are still pulling together requirements.

If the web site is accurate, then the answer is:

(a) We should keep in synch with them and consider merging the efforts.
(b) Until there is code, inversion does not exist for purposes of advancing
the EROS effort.

The second may sound harsh, but consider that both PRCS and Bitkeeper have taken much longer to actually get out there than the originators anticipated.

shap

[ Next ]
• Maybe in reply to: John C.Randolph Next in thread: Jens-Uwe Mager